Photo Gallery

Differences between HPI burner generations

Shown here are two different 400 W HPI burners in operation. The one on the left corresponds to gen 2, produced from 1969 to 1990 and featuring Philips's famous 3-piece barrel construction (see [url=https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=664]there[/url] for more information), while the one on the right is much more recent, i.e., gen 5 introduced in 2005 and still in production. An operation in the vertical position reveals the superiority of the latest HPI generation: the plasma is far more homogeneous and has a higher sodium density while the amount of dosed additives is lower than in older lamps. This is evidence of both a higher operating temperature and a more even temperature distribution of the gen 5 burner. This comparison shows how far Philips went with the development and improvement of its HPI lamp platform.


Keywords: Lamps

Differences between HPI burner generations


Shown here are two different 400 W HPI burners in operation. The one on the left corresponds to gen 2, produced from 1969 to 1990 and featuring Philips's famous 3-piece barrel construction (see there for more information), while the one on the right is much more recent, i.e., gen 5 introduced in 2005 and still in production. An operation in the vertical position reveals the superiority of the latest HPI generation: the plasma is far more homogeneous and has a higher sodium density while the amount of dosed additives is lower than in older lamps. This is evidence of both a higher operating temperature and a more even temperature distribution of the gen 5 burner. This comparison shows how far Philips went with the development and improvement of its HPI lamp platform.

PZGRL-DNaT-400-5.jpg DSCN9693.JPG HPI_burners.jpg 20230127_223005.jpg 20230127_222931.jpg
File information
Filename:HPI_burners.jpg
Album name:Max / Lamps
Keywords:Lamps
Filesize:270 KiB
Date added:Feb 23, 2025
Dimensions:793 x 805 pixels
Displayed:13 times
Software:Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
URL:https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=688
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 2 of 2
Page: 1

Tuopeek   [Feb 24, 2025 at 09:53 AM]
Nice detail and clarity in these images. Always liked that early design and don't have an example in my collection. Early halide lamps were always relatively quite expensive and out of reach of my pocket money. Interesting how much the later design resemble the normal HP mercury vapour arc tube, although with blemish free quartz.
Max   [Mar 01, 2025 at 10:39 PM]
That blemish is just silica deposit from the burner's manufacturing process. It's presence as no impact on the lamp's key characteristics. Philips certainly went back to a basic design in its last HPI burner generation, made possible by improved material and production techniques. While the former enables a longer service life at higher power load and temperature, the latter reduced manufacturing tolerances, as necessary to achieve consistent light color and output. So, it may look like a basic HP burner but this is definitely much more advanced technology.

Despite its technological inferiority, I'm still fascinated by the earlier (i.e., gen 2) variant of the HPI burner. This presents a simple yet elegant solution to the limitations in material and manufacturing techniques that prevailed back in the 1960s. Although the mercury lamp filled with iodides of sodium, thallium and indium is a GE invention, this is really Jacobs's barrel burner design with a shortened arc length, developed at Philips, which made the technology truly competitive, so Philips's 2nd-gen HPI certainly holds a special place in the history of lighting. Personally, I remember first seeing them at my hometown's sport center when I was a kid, and for some reason that particular lamp shape and color struck me as highly unusual so, of course, I had to have one Smile

Comment 1 to 2 of 2
Page: 1