| FILE 20/987 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Lamp/Fixture Information | |
| Manufacturer: | Philips |
| Model Reference: | SOX-Plus 35W |
| Lamp | |
| Lamp Type: | Sodium low pressure |
| Filament/Radiator Type: | Nonthermal discharge in neon, argon, and sodium vapor |
| Base: | BY22d |
| Shape/Finish: | Tubular clear with ITO coating |
| Electrical | |
| Wattage: | 15.9 W |
| Voltage: | 138.1 V |
| Current: | 0.142 A |
| Optical | |
| Lumen Output: | 1235 lm |
| Lumen Efficacy: | 77.7 lm/W |
| Colour Temperature: | 1770 K |
| Colour Rendering Index: | -45 Ra8 |
| Physical/Production | |
| Factory Location: | Hamilton, Scotland |
| Fabrication Date: | November 2001 |
| File information | |
| Filename: | DSCF0281m.jpg |
| Album name: | Max / Misc lamps and lighting |
| Keywords: | Lamps |
| Filesize: | 718 KiB |
| Date added: | 06 Apr 2026 |
| Dimensions: | 1500 x 1000 pixels |
| Displayed: | 26 times |
| DateTime Original: | 2026:04:06 19:05:42 |
| Exposure Time: | 1/30 sec |
| FNumber: | f/3.2 |
| File Source: | Digital Still Camera |
| Flash: | No Flash |
| Focal length: | 18 mm |
| ISO: | 160 |
| Model: | X-E4 |
| Software: | Adobe Photoshop 25.7 (Windows) |
| White Balance: | 0 |
| URL: | https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=1190 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
How was the dimming done..? Just by reducing the supply voltage or another means..?
|
|
|||
|
Current was adjusted just by varying the ballast's input voltage. An interesting characteristic of leakage-flux transformers is that they are essentially voltage-to-current converters in the sense that the regulated current output is directly proportional to the input voltage. This property is very convenient for experiments such as the one shown here!
|
|
|||
|
Thanks, I'll have to give it a try sometime
|
|
|||
|
Very cool setup Max! How would the lamp react to a dimming schedule? Like 100% for 2hrs; 75% for 1hr; 50% for 1hr; 100% for 1hr
|
|
|||
|
Thanks! The lamp reacts pretty much instantaneously to the power change, and then there is the thermal inertia which affects the electrical characteristics in the course of ~10 minutes. As opposed to metal halide lamps, sodium and mercury lamps are quite easy to dim as the discharge's re-ignition spike does not grow out of control as a result of a sudden decrease in applied current. This is quite convenient and makes those lamps relatively easy to operate.
|
|
|||
|
That's good to know. It's a shame the dimming never made into SOX ballasts apart form a couple of seldom examples. Dimming SON was of course very common, but I think it was over used, and excessively dimmed in places as well.
|
|
|||
|
SOX was considered old tech and on the decline in the 2000s when dimmable electronic control gears for HID lamps became a thing. Moreover, I think the impact of dimming on the lumen efficacy is just too great also to justify this function in electronic SOX ballasts; maximum efficacy was the main selling point for low-pressure sodium.
|
|
|||
|
It's a shame really, but I do get it. No point spending loads of money on something that won't be all that useful and replaced soon anyway.
|
|
|||
|
Light sources and gears manufacturers are (usually) very pragmatic, they don't have the emotions we -collectors and enthusiasts- usually associate with those lamps and ballasts.
|
Comment 1 to 9 of 9 Page: 1 |