Photo Gallery

1984 Philips SOXD-E 18W

The lamp shown here is the largest variant of the ultra-compact SOX fitted with an E27 end cap, developed by Leo Sprengers at Philips from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s (see [url=https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=274]there[/url] for a more detailed introduction). Built with a T12 outer glass jacket, the SOXD-E 18W features a more evolved design involving a thin burner supported by reflective metal discs at both extremities, forming an IR-reflecting cavity with the ITO-coated bulb which contains the entire discharge tube, thereby resulting in its optimum thermal insulation. Heat losses are further limited by a vacuum environment which is maintained by two getters: a barium mirror near the end cap and a platinum catalyst pellet on the other end. The latter cracks hydrocarbon impurities. To ensure a proper and stable sodium vapor distribution between the electrodes during operation, the burner is provided with two sodium retention chambers and a narrow U bend that ensures a sufficiently high operating temperature there. Stability is further secured thanks to the electrically floating disks and ITO coating which limits the rate of electrolytic sodium loss from the burner.

This optimized lamp design is characterized by a 120 lm/W efficacy, which corresponds to a  20 % gain over the standard SOX 18W. This is realized for one part from a more efficient sodium discharge operating at a lower current (0.25 vs. 0.35 A), and for another part from reduced electrode losses (also due to the lower drive current). These changes arise primarily as a result of a higher discharge electric field that is caused by the narrower burner tube diameter, which confers the lamp a higher operating voltage (75 vs 57 V).

Like other lamps in the SOXD series, this variant is compatible with the standard PL lamp series choke and starter circuit. The sodium lamp was even made with similar dimensions as those of the 18 W PL-L so as to fit standard compact fluorescent luminaires too, while delivering 80 % more light for the same system power consumption of ~24 W. The SOXD-E 18W thus targeted safety lighting applications catered for by 150 W GLS lamps while enabling an energy saving of nearly 85 %. However, like the rest of the compact sodium lamp series, this model was never released on the market.


Keywords: Lamps

1984 Philips SOXD-E 18W


The lamp shown here is the largest variant of the ultra-compact SOX fitted with an E27 end cap, developed by Leo Sprengers at Philips from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s (see there for a more detailed introduction). Built with a T12 outer glass jacket, the SOXD-E 18W features a more evolved design involving a thin burner supported by reflective metal discs at both extremities, forming an IR-reflecting cavity with the ITO-coated bulb which contains the entire discharge tube, thereby resulting in its optimum thermal insulation. Heat losses are further limited by a vacuum environment which is maintained by two getters: a barium mirror near the end cap and a platinum catalyst pellet on the other end. The latter cracks hydrocarbon impurities. To ensure a proper and stable sodium vapor distribution between the electrodes during operation, the burner is provided with two sodium retention chambers and a narrow U bend that ensures a sufficiently high operating temperature there. Stability is further secured thanks to the electrically floating disks and ITO coating which limits the rate of electrolytic sodium loss from the burner.

This optimized lamp design is characterized by a 120 lm/W efficacy, which corresponds to a 20 % gain over the standard SOX 18W. This is realized for one part from a more efficient sodium discharge operating at a lower current (0.25 vs. 0.35 A), and for another part from reduced electrode losses (also due to the lower drive current). These changes arise primarily as a result of a higher discharge electric field that is caused by the narrower burner tube diameter, which confers the lamp a higher operating voltage (75 vs 57 V).

Like other lamps in the SOXD series, this variant is compatible with the standard PL lamp series choke and starter circuit. The sodium lamp was even made with similar dimensions as those of the 18 W PL-L so as to fit standard compact fluorescent luminaires too, while delivering 80 % more light for the same system power consumption of ~24 W. The SOXD-E 18W thus targeted safety lighting applications catered for by 150 W GLS lamps while enabling an energy saving of nearly 85 %. However, like the rest of the compact sodium lamp series, this model was never released on the market.

IMG_9239.jpg 2020-05-28_GEC_HPS21U_120W.jpg Philips_SOXD-E_18W_-_NL_1984.JPG HQI-BT_400W_on_HPM_ballast.JPG 2020-05-27_Narva_HgE213.jpg
Lamp/Fixture Information
Manufacturer:Philips
Model Reference:SOXD-E 18W
Lamp
Lamp Type:Sodium low pressure
Filament/Radiator Type:Nonthermal discharge in neon, argon and sodium vapor
Base:E27s
Shape/Finish:Tubular infrared reflecting (ITO coated)
Burning Position:Base up ±110°
Electrical
Wattage:18 W
Voltage:75 V
Current:0.25 A
Optical
Lumen Output:2.16 klm
Lumen Efficacy:120 lm/W
Colour Temperature:1770 K
Colour Rendering Index:-45 Ra8
Physical/Production
Dimensions:223L x 37Ø mm
Factory Location:Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Fabrication Date:November 1984
Application/Use:Testing and characterization (intended for safety lighting)
File information
Filename:Philips_SOXD-E_18W_-_NL_1984.JPG
Album name:Max / Nonthermal discharge lamps
Keywords:Lamps
Filesize:342 KiB
Date added:21 Sep 2025
Dimensions:1500 x 643 pixels
Displayed:22 times
DateTime Original:2017:03:05 18:20:19
Exposure Time:1/18 sec
FNumber:f/8
File Source:Digital Still Camera
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:34.3 mm
ISO:400
Model:X-T1
Software:Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
White Balance:1
URL:https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=979
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 11 of 11
Page: 1

Tuopeek   [Mon 22 Sep 2025 at 10:28]
Another amazing bit of lamp development we never got to see commercially. Having the electrical characteristic for use on PL ballast must have made it a real marketing possibility at the time. Great to know you have these engineering samples saved Max.
Ria   [Tue 23 Sep 2025 at 11:38]
It always fascinates me to see a LPS lamp with a screw cap..! LPS
Max   [Wed 24 Sep 2025 at 08:50]
That's certainly not a common sight, especially in such a compact lamp format.

Tuopeek - The case for the SOXD made good sense back then, but its competition with the PL proved fatal as the compact fluorescent lamp was much cheaper to produce and had way more applications possible, which open up a potentially much bigger market for the white lamp.
347vPowerlite   [Wed 24 Sep 2025 at 22:27]
Interesting, I'm always fascinated at the attempts Philips made to develop SOX in smaller form factors. Granted I'm not sure how viable this was as SOX lamps still had limited applications compared to PL.

I wonder what was the reasoning for the screw cap, it seems like the BY22D cap made more sense as the orientation of the discharge tube is more consistent, especially with the lamp horizontal.
Max   [Thu 25 Sep 2025 at 07:19]
Good question about the end cap! I guess either they used whatever was available in the lab, or they decided that burner alignment is not a critical aspect of the system. The latter could be justified by the fact that safety/area lighting does not use/require the same precise optics and photometric light distribution as in streetlighting, where an even illumination of the road is a key system requirement.
AgentHalogen_87   [Fri 26 Sep 2025 at 23:08]
That does make me wonder, if you have two identical fixtures, say 35W SOX street lanterns for example, but one had the lamp with the limbs of the arc tube in an over / under orientation, and the other had the lamp with a side by side orientation, how different would the photometrics be assuming the physical lamp position, reflector and refractor bowl is identical in both lanterns?
Max   [Sat 27 Sep 2025 at 06:12]
In the first case (the standard one) more light is projected sideways, as required to get what we call a "batwing" light distribution, needed for an even surface illumination. In the second case, more light will be directed downward and less sideways, which will result is a bright zones under the luminaire and darker areas between poles. This all arise because SOX lamps don't have a symmetrical light distribution, hence the need for the bayonet end cap in applications where light distribution is critical.
AgentHalogen_87   [Sat 27 Sep 2025 at 07:30]
That's great information, thank you Smile
Max   [Sat 27 Sep 2025 at 13:23]
You're welcome! The refractor optic is crucial to the realization of the right light distribution with SOX lamps. In the case of the miniature SOXD-E 18W, the intention was a usage in outdoors CFL luminaires, most of which are provided with a simple diffuse cover.
Ria   [Sat 27 Sep 2025 at 16:50]
In the Philips SRS201 135W luminaire we had (traded it as we didn't really have the space) the lamp was arranged with the arc tube arranged horizontally rather than vertically, I did think it was strange at the time.
Max   [Sat 27 Sep 2025 at 19:24]
That's intriguing indeed... maybe they went for that configuration because of a high luminaire height and an adapted pattern for the refractor bowl.

Comment 1 to 11 of 11
Page: 1