|
FILE 428/490 |
Lamp/Fixture Information | |
Manufacturer: | The General Electric Company of England |
Model Reference: | MA/H |
Lamp | |
Lamp Type: | Medium pressure mercury lamp |
Filament/Radiator Type: | Aluminosilicate glass arc tube |
Base: | E40 |
Shape/Finish: | Tubular, clear |
Burning Position: | Vertical cap up to horizontal |
Electrical | |
Current: | 4.2A |
Physical/Production | |
Factory Location: | Shaw, Oldham |
Fabrication Date: | March 1960 (Date code RC) |
File information | |
Filename: | Osram-GEC_400W_MA-H.jpg |
Album name: | Ria / Mercury Lamps |
Keywords: | Lamps |
Filesize: | 348 KiB |
Date added: | Jul 22, 2024 |
Dimensions: | 2245 x 1587 pixels |
Displayed: | 26 times |
URL: | https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=81 |
Favorites: | Add to Favorites |
Comment 1 to 12 of 12 Page: 1 |
|
|||
Looking forward to seeing this rare beast lit again.!
|
|
|||
Indeed, someone said a 400W SON ballast run at a slightly lower mains voltage should work, so we'll maybe try that soon.
|
|
|||
As the correct ballast is unobtanium, that's the best we can do.
|
|
|||
Think I have the same lamp, although with more hours on it. The start resistor has a connection issue but the outer jackets incomplete vacuum means it starts fine. I hadn't realised the current differs and have run mine up on a standard 400w MB/U mercury ballast. It does look like you might be running that horizontal though but I'm sure you know you need a magnetic deflector for that.
|
|
|||
We are running it horizontally, and it was designed for that without the deflector, hence the higher current.
|
|
|||
Wow, thanks for the information Sammi, I need to find out more on this and check if mine is indeed the same.
|
|
|||
The MA/H lamps are like hen's teeth, our other ones, which look the same, are the usual MA/V lamps, have a shufti at the etch.
|
|
|||
Ah, that sounds rare right enough think it might be the MA/V I have.
|
|
|||
Yeah, the genuine MA/H version is rather a rare beast, apparently it has a hard glass arc tube so is more able to withstand horizontal burning, but from what I can gather, the genuine ballast for it has a different tapping, not sure
|
|
|||
I see what you mean, it looks more or less physically identical to the MA/V. Also see a mention to 'special choke tapping' for the MA/H but not 100% clear if that's on the 400w MA/V choke. Glad you have this in your collection I would have missed this otherwise
|
|
|||
So are we.!
|
|
|||
@Tupoeek - I think there was a special ballast for it, but not sure. I'm guessing so, given the higher current requirement.
|
Comment 1 to 12 of 12 Page: 1 |