![]() |
FILE 2/3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Lamp/Fixture Information | |
Manufacturer: | Westinghouse Electric Corporation |
Model Reference: | C250S50/DX4 (ANSI Code: S50VA-250/DX) |
Lamp | |
Lamp Type: | High Pressure Sodium |
Filament/Radiator Type: | Polycrystal Alumina (PCA) |
Base: | E39 (Mogul) |
Shape/Finish: | ET18 |
Service Life: | 10,000 Hrs. |
Burning Position: | Universal |
Fixture | |
Ballast Type: | S50 (USA) |
Electrical | |
Wattage: | 250W ~ |
Voltage: | 100V ~ |
Current: | 3.0A ~ |
Optical | |
Lumen Output: | 22,500 |
Lumen Efficacy: | 90 LPW |
Colour Temperature: | 2,400K ~ |
Colour Rendering Index: | 65% ~ |
Physical/Production | |
Factory Location: | Bath, NY USA |
Fabrication Date: | 7/82 |
Application/Use: | Where better color rendering is desired. |
File information | |
Filename: | WC-C250S50-DX4-72-1.jpg |
Album name: | Cobrahead / High Pressure Sodium Lamps |
Keywords: | Lamps |
Filesize: | 414 KiB |
Date added: | Mar 29, 2025 |
Dimensions: | 2048 x 1018 pixels |
Displayed: | 15 times |
URL: | https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=719 |
Favorites: | Add to Favorites |
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |
|
|||
I wonder why they chose the 150w S-56 and the 200w ? Both were rather uncommon for anything other than streetlighting.
|
|
|||
Good question...if I'd been the deciding engineer, it would've been the 400W, and the 150W (52V) lamps. There's probably a good reason...
|
|
|||
My thoughts exactly ! While they were at it , they should've made a 310w also !
![]() |
|
|||
I wonder if the 200w was an attempt at getting existing users with 400w MV highbays to convert to 200w deluxe HPS. The 150w S56 is a bit puzzling, I personally would have targeted the lower wattage lamps (along with a 200w or 250w), 100w for a 175w MV recessed can replacement and 50w or 70w for a 100w MV recessed can replacement.
|
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |